Hong Kong 2003
Go to
Traditional Chinese Simplified Chinese
The Environment
SEARCH Go
photo
APPENDICES CALENDAR OF EVENTS HONG KONG: THE FACTS PHOTO GALLERY MAPS CREDITS
Home   Print this Page
     

Water and Sewerage

Water pollution has increased with urban development and population growth, and Hong Kong now produces more than two million tonnes of sewage every day. The lack of proper treatment for most of the sewage from the generally older urban areas around Victoria Harbour in the past had resulted in poor water quality there. But starting from 2002, following the full commissioning of the first stage of the Harbour Area Treatment Scheme (HATS) at the end of 2001, there has been a marked improvement.

In addition, pollution control at source is now having a positive effect, and river quality is slowly improving. The percentage of rivers in the 'good' and 'excellent' categories increased from 34 per cent in 1986 to 76 per cent in 2003, and the percentage in the 'bad' and 'very bad' categories fell from 45 per cent in 1986 to 15 per cent in 2003.

Sewage Treatment and Disposal

To treat wastewater from the main urban area, sewage collected by the local sewerage network on both sides of Victoria Harbour will be directed to the HATS system for treatment and disposal. The HATS, previously known as the Strategic Sewage Disposal Scheme, is a huge project that was originally divided into four stages.

The first stage, which collects sewage from the urban areas of Kowloon, Tsuen Wan, Kwai Tsing, Tseung Kwan O and the north-eastern part of Hong Kong Island for treatment at a sewage treatment plant at Stonecutters Island, was brought into full operation at the end of 2001. In addition to the treatment plant, which some experts considered as one of the most efficient of its kind in the world, the first stage comprises a number of preliminary treatment works at collection nodes, 23.6 kilometres of transfer tunnels up to 150 metres deep, and a tunnelled outfall which disperses the treated effluent into the western anchorage area away from core Victoria Harbour.

Since commissioning, the system has performed well. The Stonecutters Island Sewage Treatment Works, which employs a chemical treatment process, has been consistently removing about 70 per cent of the organic pollutants and 80 per cent of the solids from the sewage prior to discharge. Since the first stage actually treats about 75 per cent of the wastewater generated in the harbour catchment, it has thus reduced the total pollution load on the harbour waters by about 50 per cent. The sludge that once flowed into the harbour each day, amounting to about 600 tonnes, is now effectively being removed at the treatment works and sent to Hong Kong's modern landfills for disposal. This has brought about marked improvements in water quality in the harbour. At the eastern end of Victoria Harbour, the levels of sewage bacteria have declined up to 95 per cent, significantly reducing public health risks. Throughout the core harbour area dissolved oxygen has increased by 10 to 20 per cent and ammonia has declined by 20 to 50 per cent, helping to restore water quality to a more natural and ecologically healthier condition.

The original proposal for the subsequent stages of the scheme envisaged collection of the remainder of the untreated sewage around the harbour (from northern and western parts of Hong Kong Island) using a similar system of deep tunnels, centralised treatment at the works at Stonecutters Island, and eventual discharge of the treated effluent, after disinfection, through a long tunnelled outfall into the deep, oceanic waters to the south of Hong Kong.

This concept was reviewed in 2000 by a panel of international experts. In their report to the Government, the experts confirmed the use of deep tunnels and centralised treatment as an acceptable and cost-effective way of dealing with sewage. However, in the light of recent developments in sewage treatment technology, they recommended that, rather than pursuing the long outfall, the Government should consider upgrading the treatment level to a very high standard, and discharging the treated effluent into the harbour on a long-term basis.

The proposal to adopt a different procedure for the treatment of sewage raised a number of issues that require further study. The most important of these was whether compact sewage treatment technology developed and applied in temperate climates can treat wastewater effectively under Hong Kong conditions, and whether it was an environmentally sustainable proposition for the relatively congested Victoria Harbour to receive large volumes of effluent, although highly treated, on a long-term basis. In late 2001, the Government initiated a series of trials and studies to address these issues. The work is substantially complete and the results will be reported around the second quarter of 2004, at which time the community will have an opportunity to discuss the findings and express views on the general preference for a way forward. More details are available at the 'A Clean Harbour for Hong Kong' website, http://www.cleanharbour.gov.hk.

Sewerage Master Plans

Hong Kong has been divided into 16 areas for which sewerage master plans (SMPs) have been drawn up. The improvement works recommended under these SMPs are being carried out in a phased sewage programme so as to cater for the present and future development needs of Hong Kong. The first sewage construction works were completed in 1997 under the Chai Wan and Shau Kei Wan SMP, while the other recommended works under various SMPs are being implemented progressively.

In light of the revised population forecasts and development proposals, the sewerage master plans for Yuen Long, Kam Tin, Central and East Kowloon, Tuen Mun, Tsing Yi, the Outlying Islands, Hong Kong Island, North District and Tolo Harbour areas have been reviewed and proposals for further upgrading works are being made.

Sewer connections to individual properties are still in progress. Improvements in several parts of Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and the New Territories continue. Under the Water Pollution Control (Sewerage) Regulation, the EPD requires house owners to connect their wastewater pipes to new public sewers. In 2003, wastewater from premises housing 5 000 people was directed to public sewers so as to avoid water pollution. Since the regulation came into force at the end of 1995, wastewater from premises housing 56 000 people has been connected to public sewers.

Sewage Charges

All water users who discharge their sewage to public sewers pay a basic sewage charge. In addition, 30 trades and industries whose effluent strength well exceeds that of domestic sewage also pay a trade effluent surcharge to reflect the additional cost for treating their stronger effluent. These charges aim at recovering partially the operation and maintenance costs of sewage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities. The Government continues to provide funds for capital costs for these facilities from its Capital Works Reserve Fund. The household sewage charge in 2003 was a modest $1.20 per cubic metre of water consumed, with an exemption for the first 12 cubic metres consumed in a four-month billing period. As a one-off concession in the 2002-03 financial year, the sewage charge payable by each registered customer during the financial year was reduced by an amount not exceeding $200 and $800 for domestic and non-domestic purposes respectively, whereas the trade effluent surcharge payable was reduced by a flat rate of 30 per cent.

In addition, owing to the SARS outbreak, the Government decided that the levels of the sewage charge and the trade effluent surcharge should be reduced consecutively for a four-month billing period starting from August 2003, as part of the package of relief measures to help the community tide over the difficulties caused by the disease. The sewage charge payable by each registered customer in the billing period covering the four months from August to November 2003 has been reduced by an amount not exceeding $67 and $533 for domestic and non-domestic accounts, respectively. The trade effluent surcharge payable during the four-month billing period has been reduced by a flat rate of 60 per cent.

Livestock Waste Pollution

Indiscriminate disposal of waste from the livestock industry was formerly one of the main causes of pollution in streams and rivers in the New Territories. Before the livestock waste control scheme began in 1987, the pollution load from livestock waste — equivalent to raw sewage from more than 1.6 million people — ended up in Hong Kong's rivers and eventually the sea. Since 1988, the Waste Disposal Ordinance has banned livestock-keeping in new towns and environmentally sensitive areas. Where they are allowed, livestock farms must have proper waste treatment systems.

Under the control scheme, livestock farmers who chose to continue in business applied for a grant and a loan to help pay for pollution-control facilities. Since the start of the scheme in 1987, about $63 million has been paid out in capital grants. Farmers who chose to cease business applied for an allowance, and about $883 million has been paid. Livestock waste pollution has been reduced by 97 per cent since the inception of the control scheme.

The Government has been providing a free livestock waste collection service since 1996. A monthly average of about 5 178 tonnes of livestock waste was collected in 2003.

Bathing Beaches

Bathing beaches are an important recreational resource. To protect the health of swimmers, the Government has adopted strict standards for water quality control at bathing beaches. These standards relate to pollution measured as E.coli (the bacteria that can indicate the presence of sewage) and were devised after a thorough study of the health risk facing local bathers. The following table shows how beaches were classified in 2002 and 2003. Beaches in the 'good' and 'fair' categories meet the Government's water quality objective for bathing.

Beach
water quality
ranking

Bathing season geometric
means of E.coli count
per 100ml of beach water

Minor health risk cases per 1 000 swimmers

Number of beaches

2002

2003

Good

Up to 24

Undetectable

23

23

Fair

25 to 180

10 or less

10

11

Poor

181 to 610

11 or 15

2

1

Very Poor

More than 610

More than 15

6

6

Since 1998, beach water quality gradings for open beaches have been made available weekly through the mass media and the EPD's home page.

     
Yearbook archives: 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997
back to top
back to top