Water pollution has increased with urban development and population growth,
and Hong Kong now produces more than two million tonnes of sewage every
day. The lack of proper treatment for most of the sewage from the generally
older urban areas around Victoria Harbour in the past had resulted in
poor water quality there. But starting from 2002, following the full commissioning
of the first stage of the Harbour Area Treatment Scheme (HATS) at the
end of 2001, there has been a marked improvement.
In addition, pollution control at source is now having
a positive effect, and river quality is slowly improving. The percentage
of rivers in the 'good' and 'excellent' categories increased from 34 per
cent in 1986 to 76 per cent in 2003, and the percentage in the 'bad' and
'very bad' categories fell from 45 per cent in 1986 to 15 per cent in
2003.
To treat wastewater from the main urban area, sewage collected by the
local sewerage network on both sides of Victoria Harbour will be directed
to the HATS system for treatment and disposal. The HATS, previously known
as the Strategic Sewage Disposal Scheme, is a huge project that was originally
divided into four stages.
The first stage, which collects sewage from the urban
areas of Kowloon, Tsuen Wan, Kwai Tsing, Tseung Kwan O and the north-eastern
part of Hong Kong Island for treatment at a sewage treatment plant at
Stonecutters Island, was brought into full operation at the end of 2001.
In addition to the treatment plant, which some experts considered as one
of the most efficient of its kind in the world, the first stage comprises
a number of preliminary treatment works at collection nodes, 23.6 kilometres
of transfer tunnels up to 150 metres deep, and a tunnelled outfall which
disperses the treated effluent into the western anchorage area away from
core Victoria Harbour.
Since commissioning, the system has performed well.
The Stonecutters Island Sewage Treatment Works, which employs a chemical
treatment process, has been consistently removing about 70 per cent of
the organic pollutants and 80 per cent of the solids from the sewage prior
to discharge. Since the first stage actually treats about 75 per cent
of the wastewater generated in the harbour catchment, it has thus reduced
the total pollution load on the harbour waters by about 50 per cent. The
sludge that once flowed into the harbour each day, amounting to about
600 tonnes, is now effectively being removed at the treatment works and
sent to Hong Kong's modern landfills for disposal. This has brought about
marked improvements in water quality in the harbour. At the eastern end
of Victoria Harbour, the levels of sewage bacteria have declined up to
95 per cent, significantly reducing public health risks. Throughout the
core harbour area dissolved oxygen has increased by 10 to 20 per cent
and ammonia has declined by 20 to 50 per cent, helping to restore water
quality to a more natural and ecologically healthier condition.
The original proposal for the subsequent stages of
the scheme envisaged collection of the remainder of the untreated sewage
around the harbour (from northern and western parts of Hong Kong Island)
using a similar system of deep tunnels, centralised treatment at the works
at Stonecutters Island, and eventual discharge of the treated effluent,
after disinfection, through a long tunnelled outfall into the deep, oceanic
waters to the south of Hong Kong.
This concept was reviewed in 2000 by a panel of international
experts. In their report to the Government, the experts confirmed the
use of deep tunnels and centralised treatment as an acceptable and cost-effective
way of dealing with sewage. However, in the light of recent developments
in sewage treatment technology, they recommended that, rather than pursuing
the long outfall, the Government should consider upgrading the treatment
level to a very high standard, and discharging the treated effluent into
the harbour on a long-term basis.
The proposal to adopt a different procedure for the
treatment of sewage raised a number of issues that require further study.
The most important of these was whether compact sewage treatment technology
developed and applied in temperate climates can treat wastewater effectively
under Hong Kong conditions, and whether it was an environmentally sustainable
proposition for the relatively congested Victoria Harbour to receive large
volumes of effluent, although highly treated, on a long-term basis. In
late 2001, the Government initiated a series of trials and studies to
address these issues. The work is substantially complete and the results
will be reported around the second quarter of 2004, at which time the
community will have an opportunity to discuss the findings and express
views on the general preference for a way forward. More details are available
at the 'A Clean Harbour for Hong Kong' website, http://www.cleanharbour.gov.hk.
Hong Kong has been divided into 16 areas for which sewerage master plans
(SMPs) have been drawn up. The improvement works recommended under these
SMPs are being carried out in a phased sewage programme so as to cater
for the present and future development needs of Hong Kong. The first sewage
construction works were completed in 1997 under the Chai Wan and Shau
Kei Wan SMP, while the other recommended works under various SMPs are
being implemented progressively.
In light of the revised population forecasts and development
proposals, the sewerage master plans for Yuen Long, Kam Tin, Central and
East Kowloon, Tuen Mun, Tsing Yi, the Outlying Islands, Hong Kong Island,
North District and Tolo Harbour areas have been reviewed and proposals
for further upgrading works are being made.
Sewer connections to individual properties are still
in progress. Improvements in several parts of Hong Kong Island, Kowloon
and the New Territories continue. Under the Water Pollution Control (Sewerage)
Regulation, the EPD requires house owners to connect their wastewater
pipes to new public sewers. In 2003, wastewater from premises housing
5 000 people was directed to public sewers so as to avoid water pollution.
Since the regulation came into force at the end of 1995, wastewater from
premises housing 56 000 people has been connected to public sewers.
All water users who discharge their sewage to public sewers pay a basic
sewage charge. In addition, 30 trades and industries whose effluent strength
well exceeds that of domestic sewage also pay a trade effluent surcharge
to reflect the additional cost for treating their stronger effluent. These
charges aim at recovering partially the operation and maintenance costs
of sewage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities. The Government
continues to provide funds for capital costs for these facilities from
its Capital Works Reserve Fund. The household sewage charge in 2003 was
a modest $1.20 per cubic metre of water consumed, with an exemption for
the first 12 cubic metres consumed in a four-month billing period. As
a one-off concession in the 2002-03 financial year, the sewage charge
payable by each registered customer during the financial year was reduced
by an amount not exceeding $200 and $800 for domestic and non-domestic
purposes respectively, whereas the trade effluent surcharge payable was
reduced by a flat rate of 30 per cent.
In addition, owing to the SARS outbreak, the Government
decided that the levels of the sewage charge and the trade effluent surcharge
should be reduced consecutively for a four-month billing period starting
from August 2003, as part of the package of relief measures to help the
community tide over the difficulties caused by the disease. The sewage
charge payable by each registered customer in the billing period covering
the four months from August to November 2003 has been reduced by an amount
not exceeding $67 and $533 for domestic and non-domestic accounts, respectively.
The trade effluent surcharge payable during the four-month billing period
has been reduced by a flat rate of 60 per cent.
Indiscriminate disposal of waste from the livestock industry was formerly
one of the main causes of pollution in streams and rivers in the New Territories.
Before the livestock waste control scheme began in 1987, the pollution
load from livestock waste — equivalent to raw sewage from more than
1.6 million people — ended up in Hong Kong's rivers and eventually
the sea. Since 1988, the Waste Disposal Ordinance has banned livestock-keeping
in new towns and environmentally sensitive areas. Where they are allowed,
livestock farms must have proper waste treatment systems.
Under the control scheme, livestock farmers who chose
to continue in business applied for a grant and a loan to help pay for
pollution-control facilities. Since the start of the scheme in 1987, about
$63 million has been paid out in capital grants. Farmers who chose to
cease business applied for an allowance, and about $883 million has been
paid. Livestock waste pollution has been reduced by 97 per cent since
the inception of the control scheme.
The Government has been providing a free livestock
waste collection service since 1996. A monthly average of about 5 178
tonnes of livestock waste was collected in 2003.
Bathing beaches are an important recreational resource.
To protect the health of swimmers, the Government has adopted strict standards
for water quality control at bathing beaches. These standards relate to
pollution measured as E.coli (the bacteria that can indicate the
presence of sewage) and were devised after a thorough study of the health
risk facing local bathers. The following table shows how beaches were
classified in 2002 and 2003. Beaches in the 'good' and 'fair' categories
meet the Government's water quality objective for bathing.
Beach
water quality
ranking |
Bathing season geometric
means of E.coli count
per 100ml of beach water |
Minor health risk cases per 1 000
swimmers |
Number of beaches |
|
|
Good |
Up to 24 |
Undetectable |
|
Fair |
25 to 180 |
10 or less |
|
Poor |
181 to 610 |
11 or 15 |
|
Very Poor |
More than 610 |
More than 15 |
|
|
Since 1998, beach water quality gradings for open
beaches have been made available weekly through the mass media and the
EPD's home page. |