All water users who discharge
their sewage to public sewers have to
pay a basic sewage charge. Also, 30 trades
and industries whose effluent strength
well exceeds that of domestic sewage need
to pay a trade effluent surcharge to reflect
the additional cost of treating their
stronger effluent. These charges aim to
recover the operation and maintenance
costs of sewage collection, treatment,
and disposal facilities. The Government
continues to provide funds for capital
costs for these facilities from its Capital
Works Reserve Fund. The household sewage
charge in 2005 remained at a modest level
of $1.20 per cubic metre of water consumed,
with an exemption for the first 12 cubic
metres consumed in a four-month billing
period.
Livestock Waste
Pollution
The Waste Disposal Ordinance
bans livestock-keeping in new towns and
environmentally sensitive areas. Where
they are allowed, livestock farms must
have proper waste treatment systems.
Under the livestock
waste control scheme, livestock farmers
who choose to continue in business can
apply for a grant and a loan to help pay
for pollution-control facilities. Since
the start of the scheme in 1987, about
$63 million has been paid out in capital
grants. Farmers who choose to cease business
can apply for an allowance, and about
$883 million has been disbursed. Livestock
waste pollution has been reduced by 97
per cent since the inception of the control
scheme.
The Government provides
a free livestock waste collection service
which collected a monthly average of about
5 438 tonnes of waste during the year.
Bathing Beaches
Bathing beaches are
an important recreational resource and
the Government has adopted strict standards
for water quality control to protect the
health of swimmers. These standards indicate
the pollution level measured in terms
of E.coli (the bacterium that can indicate
the presence of sewage). The following
table shows how beaches were classified
in 2005. Beaches in the 'good' and 'fair'
categories meet the Government's water
quality objective for bathing. In 2005,
over 80 per cent of the bathing beaches
met the water quality objective.
|
Beach
water quality ranking |
Bathing season geometric mean of E.
coli count per 100ml of beach water |
Minor health risk cases per 1 000
swimmers |
Number of beaches in 2005 |
|
Good |
Up to 24 |
Undetectable |
23 |
|
Fair |
25 to 180 |
10 or less |
11 |
|
Poor |
181
to 610 |
11
to 15 |
1 |
|
Very
Poor |
More
than 610 |
More than 15 |
6 |
Beach water quality
gradings for open beaches are available
on the EPD's home page, hotline and weekly
press releases. |